U.S. News released its influential college rankings Monday, a list that continues to inspire both fascination and derision.?
Despite a change in methodology partially in response to recent criticisms, the same Ivy League and highly selective institutions still dominate the top of the list, even though there have been some significant moves among the top 14 ranked schools.???
For years, college officials have complained behind closed doors that the U.S. News rankings incentivize behavior that’s not always in the best interest of students. This year, the rankings even became a target of Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona.?
“It’s time to stop worshiping at the false altar” of the U.S. News rankings, Cardona said at a gathering of law schools convened by Harvard and Yale to talk about how best to share data after those two schools and others left the U.S. News law-school rankings last year. “Colleges spend enormous resources chasing rankings they feel carry prestige but, in practice, just Xerox privilege and drive-up costs.”?
Despite the exodus of top law and medical schools from the professional rankings, undergraduate colleges — even some whose professional schools defected — have largely continued participating in the still highly influential rankings.?
Columbia University was probably the highest-profile school to say it wouldn’t share undergraduate data with U.S. News. That announcement, earlier this year, came after the school dropped from No. 2 to No. 18, in the wake of an analysis from one of the school’s math professors alleging the school submitted “highly misleading” statistics to the publication. Columbia later acknowledged that data it sent to U.S. News were flawed.?
This year, Columbia tied for the No. 12 spot.
Other major movers near the top of the list include the University of Chicago, which fell six spots to No.12, and Duke University, which climbed three spots to No. 7. Duke’s move up the rankings comes a little more than a week after the New York Times called the school “one of the least economically diverse in the country.” The piece echoed concerns expressed by some college leaders and Cardona — that devoting resources to things that can help a school climb the rankings may be in tension with providing benefits to students, particularly low-income ones.?
Duke’s president, Vincent Price, said in a statement responding to the article that the school cares “deeply about socioeconomic diversity,” while acknowledging that the Duke has “more work to do in this area.” He cited efforts that are already underway that have “yielded significant positive results,” including expanding financial aid for students from the Carolinas.?
“While we certainly have more yet to do, I am proud of the many ways our faculty, staff, student leaders and administrators are together striving to make Duke a more accessible and supportive community for students from all backgrounds,” Price said.?
Jeremy Mainer, a University of Chicago spokesperson, pointed to methodology changes in the rankings as part of the reason for the change in the school’s position on the list. He wrote in an email that the institution “offers an exceptional undergraduate education and experience.”
“While rankings can fluctuate from year to year, we?believe in and?remain committed to?academics and?the fundamentals that have long defined the UChicago experience?— such as our smaller class size and the educational level of instructors, considerations that were eliminated from this year’s?U.S. News and World Report?ranking metrics,” Manier wrote.
Much of the broader controversy surrounding U.S. News rankings in higher-education policy circles has centered around the idea that factors that have traditionally played a role in the rankings, like selectivity, standardized-test scores and spending per student, reflect an institution’s wealth and the wealth of the students who attend. Instead, critics have said rankings and the higher-education community should focus more on how colleges improve students’ chances of success.?
“Higher education should measure what matters, not just what’s become tradition to measure,” said Diane Cheng, vice president of research and policy at the Institute for Higher Education Policy. “We should recognize and celebrate colleges that help their students.”??
The changes in the U.S. News methodology this year appear to have come in response to some of those concerns. More than half of a school’s ranking is based on measures of graduates’ success, including graduation rates for first-generation and low-income students. The publication dropped acceptance rate as a metric a few years ago, and this year stopped counting class size, alumni giving and three other factors that schools had derided.???
These changes and the proliferation of other rankings that focus on social mobility are all “in the right direction,” Cheng said. Still, she noted, “the colleges that are providing economic mobility are not often the ones that are claiming the spotlight in some of these high-profile rankings.”?
The changes to the U.S. News methodology did help give many schools a boost, the publication noted. For example, Rutgers University at New Brunswick, the flagship campus of New Jersey’s biggest public university, cracked the top 40 for the first time in part because of the uptick in the weight the rankings place on enrolling and graduating students from economically diverse backgrounds, the publication said. The school was tied at No. 40 with the University of Washington and Tufts University, which fell from last year’s No. 32 ranking.
U.S. News also highlighted schools that jumped more than 50 spots thanks to the methodology change. Still, to Cheng’s point, none of these cracked the top 150 on the list.?